If a complaint with a UK communications provider proves unsatisfactory then the customer is entitled to take their problem up to the national regulatory body and its various ADR schemes.
The New UK Communications Regulator
Ofcom is the regulator for the communication industries in the UK. Its has taken over the reigns of overseeing television, wireless communications, radio and telecommunications from the Broadcasting Standards Commission, the Radio Communications Agency, the Independent Television Commission, the Radio Authority and Oftel.
Ofcom deals with complaints about UK communications but as a large national authority it will tend to only deal directly with serious breaches of standards and fairness. For instance a complaint can be submitted to Ofcom directly if a TV programme breaches the broadcasting rules by featuring a product or brand; a act known as product placement
Local Resolution
Smaller issues, such as complaints about content and misinformation, should first be directed to the manager or customer service department of the organisation directly responsible and if this proves unsuccessful, then move on to the appropriate Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
Seek Advice
When considering a complaint to Ofcom it is sensible to first seek advice from a local Trading Standards Office or Citizens Advice Bureau. They will not only offer free guidance but may even take up the complaint themselves.
For communication hardware problems, if the complaint fails to find a resolution within the provider’s own procedure then Trading Standards and the Citizens Advice Bureau should be contacted about how next to proceed.
Ofcom have a website that provides useful advice on how to action a complaint within all their areas of communications responsibilities.

Tell us what went wrong and find out which ombudsman or regulator can help, whether it is worth escalating, and exactly how to take your complaint further.
Try our Which Ombudsman Do I Need? free, here on this site →Alternative Resolution Schemes
If a telephone or internet service provider’s own complaints procedure is unable find a resolution within 12 weeks, or admits defeat by issuing a letter of ‘deadlock’, then the customer should be informed of an ADR scheme they can then pursue.
It is now law that all telephone and internet service providers have to be a member of an Ofcom-approved ADR scheme. There are currently two standard schemes – Otelo and CISAS.
If a customer has a complaint about a communications service provider, the organisation should inform them which scheme they subscribe to so that it can be followed up with them. If a company is not a member of either scheme then Ofcom should be informed, so that action can be taken against them.
CISAS provides a free, independent arbitration service, and the Office of the Telecommunications Ombudsman (Otelo) offers an ombudsman scheme but each are focused on resolving disputes between telephone and internet service providers and their customers.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
When is a Complaint Eligible For an ADR Scheme?
The complaint must concern a company that is a member of the respective CISAS and Otelo schemes. Currently Otelo’s membership includes British Telecom, O2 and Vodafone, and CISAS has Orange, T-Mobile and Tiscali.
Both schemes stipulate that a complaint must concern the provision of mobile phone, landline phone or web services, as well as well as specific services like voice mail and text messaging. Complaints could cover such subjects as customer service, repairs, privacy or accounts and billing.
Neither scheme is able to deal with complaints regarding the content of the internet or phone messages. They are both free services and are available to all consumers and very small businesses.
Potential Outcomes
The companies with either CISAS or Otelo membership are bound by the conclusions of the scheme and can be ordered to provide an explanation or apology, offer a certain service or product or pay up compensation of up to £5000.
Nevertheless, big consumer success stories and large payouts are a relative rarity. Historical data shows that many cases result in non-monetary recommendations, with modest financial awards being common.
Accepting or Declining the Decision
Once the consumer receives a verdict from the ADR they have 6 weeks to decide whether to accept it or not. If they accept it then the guilty company must take the appropriate action within the succeeding 4 weeks. If the consumer declines the verdict or fails to come to a decision in the allotted time then the decree is no longer binding and they can pursue the case in the courts.
As it happened a family member fraudulantly took it out in my name!! I contacted Vodafone constantly, up to 5 times a day..advisor would pass me to another dept. I would have to go through the whole story again and again, the call would cut-off, I would be put on hold-the longest time was 37mins- excuse after excuse. I was by this time irate, raging, at my wits end. When I threatened going to the paper I was told they would investigate and look for the culprit after I gave them her recent address.
I was advised the case was closed but it wasn't.
I had a heart attack in the November and the medical staff said the stress Vodafone put in me was the cause. Even typing this I feel wound up. Vidafone are a DISGRACE and their customer service DIABOLICLE.
Does the story end here?? I wish..2 weeks ago I recieved a letter from ANOTHER debt collection agency Vodafone have sent my details too.
I honestly don't know when this is going to end!!!
As far as I'm concerned the fine they recieved today is no way near as much as it should be.
Also when I'm making a call the phone closes down like I had switched it off and on again, and it needs charged twice a day and the carver input piece dose not work properly either as iv got to learn something on it to keep it charging which also takes hours, for exp' I had just taken it off a full charge to write this and it now needs put back on, now I am at my Witt's end with this phone and network but I can't afford to just fork out and buy another handset as I'm a single parent with three kids, I hope to hear from you asap please and get some sort of settlement as I am not at all pleased with your handset or network.
Before Nov 2014 I had been a customer with 02 for years and did not once have any trouble with that network.
Thank you for reading my complaint, Yours Diane Robb.
He then said 'We are never going to do that" he then said "we will put a credit default notice on your credit report that will put you under pressure to pay up. Remember this will be on your report for six years"
I asked if this was true and he said it was in the Vodaphone terms and conditions and that I should look through them myself to find it. He was not prepared to say where this appeared in the terms and conditions.I then said that what he had stated was highly unethical and that the call was being recorded (by Vodaphone) I asked him to repeat his statement but he then when in to a very defensive mode and terminated the call. I think he thought I meant that I was recording the call.
Aside from the dispute I find this wholly unethical for Vodpahone to act in this way. In the meantime I have debt collectors phoning me every day.
Can anyone suggest how I get Vodpahone to be accountable and accept a reasonable challenge to resolve this. At the moment they are acting like thugs. The impact on my credit rating is self evident.
Ask Complaint Expert a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.