How speeding offences work in the UK
If you are caught speeding in the UK, you will typically face a fine and penalty points on your driving licence. The two main ways drivers are caught are through fixed or mobile speed cameras and by police officers using handheld speed detection devices at the roadside.
The standard fixed penalty for speeding is £100 and three points on your licence, though the actual penalty depends on how far over the limit you were travelling and whether your case goes to court. For more serious cases, fines can be much higher and you may receive more points or even a driving ban. You can find current penalty bands on the GOV.UK page for speeding penalties.
In some circumstances, you may be offered a speed awareness course instead of points. This option is typically available to drivers who were only slightly over the limit and who have not completed a similar course within the previous three years. Completing the course means you avoid the points, though you will still need to pay a fee for the course itself.

Tell us what went wrong and find out which ombudsman or regulator can help, whether it is worth escalating, and exactly how to take your complaint further.
Try our Which Ombudsman Do I Need? free, here on this site →The Notice of Intended Prosecution
Before you can be prosecuted for a speeding offence, you must receive a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP). This document informs you that you may face legal action for a traffic offence.
When a speed camera catches you, the NIP must be sent to the registered keeper of the vehicle within 14 days of the alleged offence. The legal requirement is that the notice is sent to the last known address held by the DVLA. If the NIP arrives late, you may have grounds to challenge, but this is not straightforward. Where DVLA records were out of date, or where the notice was sent on time but delayed in the post, courts may still allow the prosecution to proceed. If you believe the NIP arrived late, seek advice before assuming the matter is closed.
The situation differs if a police officer stops you at the roadside. In this case, the officer can issue a verbal NIP on the spot, which counts as valid notification. Written confirmation may follow, but it is not legally required once a verbal warning has been given.
Along with the NIP, you will usually receive a Section 172 notice. This legally requires you to identify the driver of the vehicle at the time of the offence. Failing to respond to this notice is itself an offence and can result in six penalty points.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Grounds for challenging a speeding fine
Contesting a speeding fine is possible, but the grounds for doing so are limited. The prosecution needs only to prove that you were exceeding the speed limit.
You cannot successfully argue that you did not realise you were speeding, that you did not intend to speed, or that you were only slightly over the limit. These are not recognised defences under UK law.
Defences that may be accepted include the following:
- You were not actually speeding and the detection equipment was faulty or incorrectly calibrated
- You were not the driver of the vehicle at the time of the alleged offence
- The speed limit signage in the area was missing, obscured or did not comply with legal requirements
- The vehicle identified in the camera image was not yours, perhaps due to a misread number plate
- The NIP was not served within the required 14 day period and no valid reason exists for the delay
If you believe you have a valid defence, you will need to request a court hearing rather than simply paying the fixed penalty. Bear in mind that opting for a court hearing may result in higher penalties if the court rules against you.
How to make your challenge
If you wish to contest the fine, do not ignore the paperwork. You must still respond to the Section 172 notice identifying the driver, even if you plan to dispute the offence itself.
To request a court hearing, indicate this on the paperwork you receive or write to the police force that issued the notice. Keep copies of all correspondence and any evidence that supports your case, such as photographs of unclear signage or proof that you were not driving.
Consider seeking legal advice before proceeding. Motoring solicitors can assess whether your defence is likely to succeed, and many offer an initial consultation at no cost. Citizens Advice can also provide general guidance on your options.
If the penalty stands and you accumulate 12 or more points within three years, you will usually face a driving ban. Responding promptly to any notice and seeking advice early can help you understand your options and avoid reaching this threshold. Drivers who have held their licence for less than two years face stricter rules and may have their licence revoked after reaching six points.
Full details of the penalties, the points system and your rights are available on GOV.UK under the motoring section covering penalty points and driving bans.
i was travelling at 37 mph when a mobile camera captured the offence at 9.20pm in the evening just before the bend going downhill
i have driven over my tracks and the only 30 mph sign is painted on the road in the opposite direction which could not be seen at night there are no other signs anywhere the road is well lit and is not a danger access could be an issue for some private housing there is a mirror on the bend to assist access and egress
Thanks
Ironically the next day they’re asking people to help them find a set of temporary pedestrian crossings that had been stolen the next on the same bit of road
How do I dispute this?
I have received speed plenty tickets
And after one day I received another ticket
The first ticket I was sure I was driving my car and I replied by accepting it
Second one I wasn’t sure I thought it’s my partaner
So I have given her details and she replied by confirm that she was driving the car at that time
But she received photos from police saying that she should check carefully as the photo not typical to what she said
The the photo showing she wasn’t the driver and actually I was the driver at the time as well
So we don’t know what to do
Any advice please.
Thanks
Can anyone help?
Should I send a letter of appeal when completing the s172 statement, as surely I can't be prosecuted for driving at 0mph?
Thanks
is there anyway to appeal this??
I did send in the information required
The Governments total misuse of these draconian speed limits & cameras is unfair & totally wrong . But how can we get it stopped. Its raking in £millions for the Government but ruining our lives & livelihood's? How can we earn & pay tax`s if the Government is hellbent on taking our driving licence of us all.?
The road going in to York from Sim Balk Lane which is the A1036 Tadcaster Road is not signed as 30 mph from where I join it. When I leave my village of Bishopthorpe which is signposted at 30 mph I pass a national speed limit applies sign . On joining the road in to town which runs across this road out of the village (A1036) I do not pass any signs to tell me it is 30 mph. I have lived in this area all my life & travel the road at least twice a week now & at one time every working day in the past for many years. I always treated this road as a 40 mph zone as it is not a built up area. Street lighting is there however not consistent on both sides of the road & also obscured by extremely large trees running the length of the road. One set of traffic lights on the road at the Cross Keys slows traffic as it should however when you have passed through them the road again opens up with the racecourse to the right. I have asked local people who I have known all my life & many have not realised the road to be 30 mph limit. It is not signed as 30 mph. I believe this road needs to be to avoid travelling above this. Not all drivers who passed there test 40 yrs ago ore more realise that the extremely loose rule of street lighting to be an indication of a 30 mph zone. Why can it not be signed at 30 mph & where does the 30 mph zone start when coming off the A64 dual carriageway in towards York? It is not clear.
I have a speed limiter on my car which until I enter a 30 mph zone or a dual carriageway I have set at 40 mph. The speed cam van was parked literally 100 yards through the traffic lights mentioned where I suspect many many drivers were checked at 35 to 40 mph as I was.
Road Tax, Petrol & cars on a whole are expensive enough without tricking the public into paying fines for loose rules & bad signage.
The point is though, do I have a case of appeal against ths fine?
Geoff.
I didn't feel i was at all it was a gradual acceleration i was in no hurry.
I've never contested one before so have no idea the procedure to go through, i was just sent the letter last week asking for me to pay the fine and hand in my license to get the 3 points.
I have heard conflicting things, some people who have family lawyers advising to contest as they dont go to court ( costs too much etc... ) and others warning that it could potentially lead to a bigger fine,more points and court costs.
The argument for it not going to court is they dont have the money here in scotland to chase it up and they might offer a fine only compromise etc..
However they sent out 3 pictures and a certificate of the speed camera being calibrated the month before... so if they felt it was concrete they would have no reason not to take it to court as it wouldnt be out of their own pocket but mine.
I was parked at a set of lights and when they turned green and i drove off i was flashed 3 times, i didnt think it was for me at the time as there was another car going the other direction at speed and i thought it might have set it off.
But the letter came through my door asking for me to name myself as the owner of my car, i contacted the police the next day and asked if they could send me the images as i didn't believe it could be true.
they sent 3 pictures of my car 2 showing my car and the white lines and one with my reg plate in clear view and also a certificate of calibration.
The thing is my car has a slight alignment issue and when im starting from a stop i always hold the biting point for a second to make sure the car is going where i want it to go.... so the idea of me getting up to 41mph in such a small space of time really makes me doubt it is accurate....
however when i first passed my test, i got 6 points in my first year... i haven't had any since but i'm afraid if i contest this that it will go against me... and risk getting more points and a bigger fine, the fine isn't the issue i just dont want the points as i drive for a living.
What would you recommend ? contest or just accept the fine and points ?
thanks
I have just received a letter stating I am being taken to court for the same offence and had the £100 refunded. How can this happen 6 months after the event?
Although I was driver but at that time, that camera catch me my speed reading wasn’t work properly .that why wen I got first letter ,I went to mechanic and I fixed it immediately ;
Because I was scared maybe it cause me over speeding in other places too and I have got receipt and every thing from the mechanic that shows my speed meter has been fixed
With those thing do I have any chance to apply to the court ?
Many thanks
. also as the officer been fully trained etc.it may be a waste of time sending any letters.. Even though it asks for you to attach any further information.if you are innocent. may be very difficult to prove as well as being very expensive.finally you will not got much help from the police.as it is all a money ?? generating .the innocent have to grin and bare it
What happens if it sent out of the timeframe?
Also what if the person driving is on disability benefits, how much do they pay?
My partner was stopped by police using a hand held speed cam. He was apparently doing 64 mph in a 40 mph zone.
1) we have an overspeed limiter on our car set to 41 mph, which didn't go off.
2) we took the car to the mechanic the next day to query why it didn't go off and were told it was functioning correctly and set at the right speed.
3) the police were located on a stretch of road which has 3 static cameras. They were between 2 static cameras. None of the static cameras before the police position went off.
4) it was rush hour on a busy A road, hardly likely 64 mph could be possible in those circumstances.
5) another car passed my partner on the nearside lane and was not stopped by the police.
We have got cover for motoring offences via our home insurance and have been allocated a solicitor, but I wasn't hugely confident that she has had much experience in this specific area. When I suggested that we would need an expert report on the reliability of these hand held speed cams, she told me that the 2 panel 'experts' they use for reports are FCIR and Viewpoint Investigations, both of which appear to deal with crash type reports.
My view is that although on the face of it, there is serious doubt that the speed cam was either functioning correctly, or more probably was indicating a false reading due to a well known problem of 'slippage', we will almost certainly require an expert report to back this up. Does anyone know of such an expert that I could contact? Additionally, it might be best to switch to a solicitor with more experience contesting these types of speeding offences, in which case, are there any recommendations?
Thanks.
Is there anyway out of this or am I completely screwed. Please, any help would be appreciated. Could I appeal for 3 points and the fines? I just received the NIP today and I'm now totally bricking it.
also i had canards on the front of my bumper, the policeman thought these dangerous, even though my mot passed with them on and just mentions them as advisory aftermarket canards, he was going to take my car but i convinced him to allow me to take them off, which he saw me do! he still sent me a fine and 3 points on my licence.
do you think if i appealed the latter i may have a chance not to receive the points?
I am trying to find out if I would have to go back to London for the court hearing
Basically my elderly grandmother pushed her panic alarm while staying with me. She suffes ill health and has regular falls. The alarm people couldn't get in contact or either could I so I had to rush back to check what had happened. She had had a fall and an ambulance was called. I sent in a letter outlining what had happened and a copy of the ambulance paperwork when I received the first notice and heard nothing back so assumed it was cancelled until 5 months and 29 days later that I had a court request. Sent back the paperwork again including the letter and ambulance paperwork stating I plead guilty as didn't think I needed to attend court and got 6 points and a fine. I've never in my 13 years of driving ever had anything on my licence or been pulled. Do you think that 6 points is a little to much considering my reason (don't care about the fine) as to why I was speeding or should I just suck it up and let it go!
I am going to appeal and see what the outcome is, as I don't believe the officers acted correctly to the situation given it was my first offence.
BUT the large signs permanently sitting on the hard shoulder (50mph) had no lights on them and all the bollards were pulled to the side of the road no workers at all !!! that I assumed the road was open to normal speed limits I was still below 60mph
(I cannot afford to take the police to court ) So am I right in assuming that the speed camera`s are left on to trap motorist to make even more out of them
allbusy
i had to take the fine and points i sent all forms back and to my shock taking into account
this is my first offence in 34 years of driving, my fine was 305 plus 3 points
i have spoken to my daughter who just had a fine for doing 70 in a 50 and only got £60
and 3 points
would this br correct
thanks len
i was not happy with the conduct of policeman who dealt with this and would like to put a complaint in
Ask Complaint Expert a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.